Changes

::I think that the 2 week block was too harsh, but I disagree with the idea that the rule should be revoked.  Administrators are supposed to be chosen for their judgement, and there's nothing wrong with requiring some discussion beforehand--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 00:02, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

::I think that the 2 week block was too harsh, but I disagree with the idea that the rule should be revoked.  Administrators are supposed to be chosen for their judgement, and there's nothing wrong with requiring some discussion beforehand--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 00:02, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

:::I agree completely, and I firmly believe that this is CP's biggest flaw.  Admins should not be considered as having a greater say editorially than other editors.  A wiki is a collaborative endeavour and this rule completely inverts this process and turns editors right off.  I know it turns people off because I remember once hammering out a compromise on some (minor) articles talkpage with various people about how an article should begin, only to have an admin come in and tell us that our input was not required.  My editing slowed right down after that.  If you want to run a blog, then run a blog, if you want a wiki then lets have a wiki.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:53, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

:::I agree completely, and I firmly believe that this is CP's biggest flaw.  Admins should not be considered as having a greater say editorially than other editors.  A wiki is a collaborative endeavour and this rule completely inverts this process and turns editors right off.  I know it turns people off because I remember once hammering out a compromise on some (minor) articles talkpage with various people about how an article should begin, only to have an admin come in and tell us that our input was not required.  My editing slowed right down after that.  If you want to run a blog, then run a blog, if you want a wiki then lets have a wiki.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:53, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

::::Mr. Schlalfy approved [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&diff=prev&oldid=892763

::::Mr. Schlalfy approved [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&diff=prev&oldid=892763 changes to the Conservapedia:Guidelines] on July 23 2011, with copies sent to DMorris, Jpatt, TerryH, EdPoor, User:Conservative, and myself. User:DouglasA may not have been aware of the change. It was my mistake in not removing that language immediately from the Editing Etiquette page. The specific language removed no longer gives Sysops dictatorial charge over editors, as was the subject of numerous complaints in recent years.  I apologize to any editors this change may have inconvenienced. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:25, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

changes to the Conservapedia:Guidelines] on July 23 2011, with copies sent to DMorris, Jpatt, TerryH, EdPoor, User:Conservative, and myself. User:DouglasA may not have been aware of the change. It was my mistake in not removing that language immediately from the Editing Etiquette page. The specific language removed no longer gives Sysops dictatorial charge over editors, as was the subject of numerous complaints in recent years.  I apologize to any editors this change may have inconvenienced. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:25, 30 July 2011 (EDT)