4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 91:
Line 91: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Nobel Peace Prize nomination?
::We should present verifiable (reliable) information about the careers and viewpoints of public figures. Well, that's only my opinion - I'm the new guy around here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:57, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
::We should present verifiable (reliable) information about the careers and viewpoints of public figures. Well, that's only my opinion - I'm the new guy around here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:57, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
:::I guess I’m not seeing the same distinction you are—I’m more than willing to concede the point, but I’d like it if there could be clearer guidance on what counts as a “scandal” and what is “just gossip”. (I wouldn’t have bothered to defend the inclusion of these scandals for nearly as long as I have were I not concerned that their removal as “gossip” would get the people who added them (and I am one of those people) labeled as a violator of the [[Conservipedia Commandments]], or just as too liberal, and then banned—my inclusion of the Viagra information was (I assure you) in good faith, but, apparently, I was adding gossip— clarity is much needed here and would be much appreciated).--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 10:32, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
:::I guess I’m not seeing the same distinction you are—I’m more than willing to concede the point, but I’d like it if there could be clearer guidance on what counts as a “scandal” and what is “just gossip”. (I wouldn’t have bothered to defend the inclusion of these scandals for nearly as long as I have were I not concerned that their removal as “gossip” would get the people who added them (and I am one of those people) labeled as a violator of the [[Conservipedia Commandments]], or just as too liberal, and then banned—my inclusion of the Viagra information was (I assure you) in good faith, but, apparently, I was adding gossip— clarity is much needed here and would be much appreciated).--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 10:32, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
== Nobel Peace Prize nomination? ==
http://nobelprize.org/nomination/nomination_facts.html says:
:*Can I nominate someone for the Nobel Prize?
::If you are not invited you cannot nominate.
:*Has X been nominated as a candidate for the Nobel Prize?
::Information about the nominations, investigations, and opinions concerning the award is kept secret for fifty years.
:*What about the rumours circling around the world about certain people being nominated for the Nobel Prize this year?
::Well, either it's just a rumour, or someone among the invited nominators has leaked information. Since the nominations are kept secret for 50 years, you'll have to wait until then to find out.
Although the Landmark Legal Foundation claims to have nominated him, the [http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-01-2007/0004518421&EDATE press release] does not give any evidence whatsoever that the Foundation, or Mark R. Levin, was invited to make any such nomination. If he wasn't invited, he can't nominate. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:05, 6 April 2007 (EDT)