15
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay: Penn Jillette, here is the evidence you claim you need to debate me (view source)
Revision as of 03:11, August 3, 2011
, 03:11, August 3, 2011Undo revision 896605 by CharlesDN (talk)
:::::Hi Conservative, new user here. I think you need to take a deep breath and calm down. I understand that this debate with Penn was important to you, and you are angry that he rejected you so dismissively. But I think it's pretty clear that he won't debate you. I think Penn genuinely doesn't seem himself as a part of the new atheist movement or anything; he is primarily an illusionist who has a show about debunking what he thinks are false claims, and on occasion he comments on religion or atheism. He also seems like a very busy man. If the guy doesn't want to debate, then he doesn't want to debate. However, I'm sure there are plenty of atheists out there who would want to debate you, though. Someone less prominent, like youtubers TheAmazingAtheist, Pat Condell, and QualiaSoup (all nonetheless very popular online), would probably jump at the chance.[[User:SolomonM|SolomonM]] 23:00, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::Hi Conservative, new user here. I think you need to take a deep breath and calm down. I understand that this debate with Penn was important to you, and you are angry that he rejected you so dismissively. But I think it's pretty clear that he won't debate you. I think Penn genuinely doesn't seem himself as a part of the new atheist movement or anything; he is primarily an illusionist who has a show about debunking what he thinks are false claims, and on occasion he comments on religion or atheism. He also seems like a very busy man. If the guy doesn't want to debate, then he doesn't want to debate. However, I'm sure there are plenty of atheists out there who would want to debate you, though. Someone less prominent, like youtubers TheAmazingAtheist, Pat Condell, and QualiaSoup (all nonetheless very popular online), would probably jump at the chance.[[User:SolomonM|SolomonM]] 23:00, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
::Sam, Conservative doesn't debate people who are willing to debate him. He only issues challenges to people who are highly unlikely to want to have anything to do with him. He has been challenged a number of times previously and has refused the challenges. He then goes off and writes articles about how other people are cowards for failing to debate their point of view. Allow me to demonstrate:
:::Oh, User:Conservative, I challenge you to debate me on your pet subject of atheism. Just you and me buddy. Mano-a-mano. Show the world that you have the machismo!
::You watch Sam. He will chicken out of this challenge just as he has chickened out of all of the previous challenges. He will then run off and write about how Richard Dawkins is a coward for not debating somee creationist or other. --[[User:CharlesDN|CharlesDN]] 23:07, 2 August 2011 (EDT)