SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
Talk:Essay: Penn Jillette, here is the evidence you claim you need to debate me (view source)
Revision as of 03:12, August 3, 2011
, 03:12, August 3, 2011→Unfathomably Stupid
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:39, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:39, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
::::SamHB, I have asked you to show me outstanding content that you have created which has gained a large following to show me how it is done and you have yet to do so. I think it is time you showed me how it's done. I don't expect this to happen though. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:43, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
::::SamHB, I have asked you to show me outstanding content that you have created which has gained a large following to show me how it is done and you have yet to do so. I think it is time you showed me how it's done. I don't expect this to happen though. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:43, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::Uhhh, the place where you asked that was [[Talk:Essay:_Penn_Jillette's_walrus_slide_vs._thin_Christian_lady_dancers]]. If you look there, you will see that I replied to each of your points. Read it. Now I never claimed that my mathematical writing at Conservapedia has a "large following", though I have written other things in real life that have a large following. I won't bore you with the details. Also, the significance of a "large following" is subject to interpretation. As someone pointed out recently, one can garner a lot of attention by running naked onto a baseball field. I doubt that you have done anything that has gotten a "large following" in real life. Getting Google hits among people who like to see the wiki equivalent of a car crash isn't hard. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::Hi Conservative, new user here. I think you need to take a deep breath and calm down. I understand that this debate with Penn was important to you, and you are angry that he rejected you so dismissively. But I think it's pretty clear that he won't debate you. I think Penn genuinely doesn't seem himself as a part of the new atheist movement or anything; he is primarily an illusionist who has a show about debunking what he thinks are false claims, and on occasion he comments on religion or atheism. He also seems like a very busy man. If the guy doesn't want to debate, then he doesn't want to debate. However, I'm sure there are plenty of atheists out there who would want to debate you, though. Someone less prominent, like youtubers TheAmazingAtheist, Pat Condell, and QualiaSoup (all nonetheless very popular online), would probably jump at the chance.[[User:SolomonM|SolomonM]] 23:00, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::Hi Conservative, new user here. I think you need to take a deep breath and calm down. I understand that this debate with Penn was important to you, and you are angry that he rejected you so dismissively. But I think it's pretty clear that he won't debate you. I think Penn genuinely doesn't seem himself as a part of the new atheist movement or anything; he is primarily an illusionist who has a show about debunking what he thinks are false claims, and on occasion he comments on religion or atheism. He also seems like a very busy man. If the guy doesn't want to debate, then he doesn't want to debate. However, I'm sure there are plenty of atheists out there who would want to debate you, though. Someone less prominent, like youtubers TheAmazingAtheist, Pat Condell, and QualiaSoup (all nonetheless very popular online), would probably jump at the chance.[[User:SolomonM|SolomonM]] 23:00, 2 August 2011 (EDT)