Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,421
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + Line 13:
Line 19: + + + + +
Conservapedia:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 02:27, August 5, 2011
, 02:27, August 5, 2011Undo revision 897507 by RobSmith (talk)
Conservapedia is an open wiki that does not allow [[liberal censorship]].
Although we [[assume good faith]] as a matter of principle, some people would abuse this trust. For those visitors who violate its rules, sysops have the authority to block their accounts to protect the integrity of the site.
Vandals are blocked immediately, but other blocks are given for a period of reflection and with the hope that the user being blocked may be able to return and edit in a positive way once the time has passed.
==Blockable offenses==
==Blockable offenses==
Here are the actions which can get one's account blocked. The block comment should state clearly what the reason was.
Here are the actions which can get one's account blocked. The block comment should state clearly what the reason was.
* Inappropriate user name. It has been a ''general'' principle that one's user name be "based on one's real first name and last initial", though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish "handles" that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.
* Inappropriate user name. It has been a ''general'' principle that one's user name be "based on one's real first name and last initial", though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish "handles" that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.
* 90/10 rule violation. This rule is unique to Conservapedia. The objective is to avoid repetitive arguments. While an actual numerical check could be used, the usual application of the rule at present is a more subjective analysis of whether one is here just for engaging in combat. Remember, Conservapedia is a [[meritocracy]], and an editor's contributions to mainspace weigh in the balance more in granting [[Conservapedia:User rights|user rights]] than occuping other editors time in fruitless talk page discussion.
* 90/10 rule violation. This rule is unique to Conservapedia. The objective is to avoid repetitive arguments. While an actual numerical check could be used, the usual application of the rule at present is a more subjective analysis of whether one is here just for engaging in combat. Remember, Conservapedia is a [[meritocracy]], and an editor's contributions to mainspace weigh in the balance more in granting [[Conservapedia:User rights|user rights]] than occuping other editors time in fruitless talk page discussion.
==See also==
*[[Conservapedia:Checkuser]]
[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]