| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Trolling''' can be constituted by any one or more of the following behaviours: | + | '''Trolling''' can constitute any one or more of the following behaviours: |
| | * monopolizing discussions; | | * monopolizing discussions; |
| | * repeatedly talking more than the other side despite saying nothing coherent: | | * repeatedly talking more than the other side despite saying nothing coherent: |
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | * employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions. | | * employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions. |
| | | | |
| − | Many trolls are attention seekers, or just enjoy annoying people. Some however, have a direct purpose or agenda -- to destroy the Conservapedia project and limit its ability to build an internet community. They do so by inconveniencing and harassing users. Trolling is a [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy|blockable offense]]. However, blocking the troll does not solve the problem; determined trolls can continue their activity through blocking appeals and [[Conservapedia:sockpuppet|sockpuppetry]]. Some trolls have been known to persist for several years. | + | Many trolls are attention seekers, or they just enjoy annoying people. Some however, have a direct purpose or agenda -- to destroy the Conservapedia project and limit its ability to build an internet community. They do so by inconveniencing and harassing users. Trolling is a [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy|blockable offense]]. However, blocking the troll does not always solve the problem; determined trolls can continue their activity through blocking appeals and [[Conservapedia:sockpuppet|sockpuppetry]]. Some trolls have been known to persist for several years. |
| | | | |
| − | Dealing with longterm abusive editors can be problematic. Blocking them does not make them go away, they can return angrier and more determined to attack and harass a specific user, or article pages. | + | Dealing with longterm abusive editors can be problematic. Blocking them does not make them go away; they can return angrier and more determined to attack and harass a specific user, or article pages. |
| | | | |
| | ==See also== | | ==See also== |
| | *[[Liberal censorship]] | | *[[Liberal censorship]] |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Conservapedia Administration]] | | [[Category:Conservapedia Administration]] |