Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,742
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 88:
Line 88: + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 18:11, August 6, 2011
, 18:11, August 6, 2011→Intro
:It is a bit of a slippery slope because I might make raise arguments about a pages contents and be blocked for trolling under the "arguments for the liberal point of view". The 9/10 rule should be used as opposed to trolling. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 00:04, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
:It is a bit of a slippery slope because I might make raise arguments about a pages contents and be blocked for trolling under the "arguments for the liberal point of view". The 9/10 rule should be used as opposed to trolling. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 00:04, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
::Well, that's virtually the same thing. The key phrase is, "redundant arguments". I'm more concerned about sysops who block people because they are liberal, or obese, or atheists, than because they made repeated pitches for some obese liberal apologetics after it was established criticism of obesity is Christian and family friendly (this is just an example). [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:12, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
::Well, that's virtually the same thing. The key phrase is, "redundant arguments". I'm more concerned about sysops who block people because they are liberal, or obese, or atheists, than because they made repeated pitches for some obese liberal apologetics after it was established criticism of obesity is Christian and family friendly (this is just an example). [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:12, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
===Illustration===
In a case from recent memory User:C blocked User:BS as a "parodist." When asked for evidence to justify the block under CP policy, User:C provided none. User:C made a lengthy argument that User:BS, who had several "I am a Christian" userboxes in CP, was ''allegedy'' another User:SC aat RW 2.0. User:SC at RW 2.0 had several "this user is an atheist" userboxes at that website. With no evidence or explanation, User:C concluded that User:BS "had lied" at CP, and was a parodist. '''[[Conservapedia:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia]]''' specifically states,
*11.We respect users' control over their own talk pages as much as possible. Wikipedia treats users' own talk pages like government or public property, and it becomes a place for Wikipedia editors to bully users.
*15.We do not ban users based on their comments elsewhere, such as on their own blog. Wikipedia will monitor users' blogs and ban them for their exercise of free speech on their own blogs.
'''[[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Duties]]''' specifiaclly sates,
*Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons.
So, User:BS was blocked, evidently, for ideological views he expressed on another site, assuming the two are the same person. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:11, 6 August 2011 (EDT)