Changes

(7) The limit is not taken in E=γmc² (m is the invariant mass) but in E² = (pc)² + (mc²)². If m=0 then E=|p|c: the ratio between the magnitude of the speed '|v|' and the speed of light 'c' is given by (|p|c)/E, so |v|=c. There is no discontinuity: these formulas can be found on every basic relativity textbook.

(7) The limit is not taken in E=γmc² (m is the invariant mass) but in E² = (pc)² + (mc²)². If m=0 then E=|p|c: the ratio between the magnitude of the speed '|v|' and the speed of light 'c' is given by (|p|c)/E, so |v|=c. There is no discontinuity: these formulas can be found on every basic relativity textbook.

(8) <u>None of them</u>. The longitudinal inertia is proportional to γ³m (which is not the relativistic mass), the transverse inertia to γm (which is the relativistic mass). Inertia, rest mass and relativitstica mass have different meanings, they coincide only when the particle is much slower than light. Please note that same effect is also present in the electromagnetic theory (inertia caused by the self-interaction between a charged object and his own electromagnetic field) ''without'' using relativity.

(8) <u>The relativistic one, but it's a coincidence</u>. The longitudinal inertia is proportional to γ³m (which is not the relativistic mass), the transverse inertia to γm (which is the relativistic mass). Inertia, rest mass and relativitstica mass have different meanings, they coincide only when the particle is much slower than light. Please note that same effect is also present in the electromagnetic theory (inertia caused by the self-interaction between a charged object and his own electromagnetic field) ''without'' using relativity.

See, for example: Lorentz, H.A. (1899), "[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dwc.knaw.nl%2FDL%2Fpublications%2FPU00014586.pdf&rct=j&q=Lorentz%2C%20H.A.%20(1899)%2C%20%22Simplified%20Theory%20of%20Electrical%20and%20Optical%20Phenomena%20in%20Moving%20Systems%22%20filetype%3Apdf&ei=UtNDTu6iDcPQsgaG5Nn0Bw&usg=AFQjCNFdeh3z8bGjXCGF3sVO5vfjrz2VZQ&sig2=ZTmtnZRgRwCY7LGxkC17uw&cad=rja Simplified Theory of Electrical and Optical Phenomena in Moving Systems]", Proc. Roy. Soc. Amst.: 427-442.

See, for example: Lorentz, H.A. (1899), "[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dwc.knaw.nl%2FDL%2Fpublications%2FPU00014586.pdf&rct=j&q=Lorentz%2C%20H.A.%20(1899)%2C%20%22Simplified%20Theory%20of%20Electrical%20and%20Optical%20Phenomena%20in%20Moving%20Systems%22%20filetype%3Apdf&ei=UtNDTu6iDcPQsgaG5Nn0Bw&usg=AFQjCNFdeh3z8bGjXCGF3sVO5vfjrz2VZQ&sig2=ZTmtnZRgRwCY7LGxkC17uw&cad=rja Simplified Theory of Electrical and Optical Phenomena in Moving Systems]", Proc. Roy. Soc. Amst.: 427-442.

(13) I've never heard about an experiment that aimed to the direct search of gravitons. Physicists don't expect to find gravitons in particle or astroparticle experiments, their theoretical (tree-level) cross section is too small (please excuse me for the jargon). This entry needs citations

(13) I've never heard about an experiment that aimed to the direct search of gravitons. Physicists don't expect to find gravitons in particle or astroparticle experiments, their theoretical (tree-level) cross section is too small (please excuse me for the jargon). This entry needs citations

from academic sources.

from academic sources, but I doubt strongly they exist at all.

(16) An example: Relativistic Field Theories. Some Nobel prizes in physics were given for work on RFTs.

(16) An example: Relativistic Field Theories (see [[Quantum field theory]]). Some Nobel prizes in physics were given for work on RFTs.

(26) As I demostrated before, E=|p|c. (E means energy, |p| means the magnitude of the momentum)

(26) As I demostrated before, E=|p|c. (E means energy, |p| means the magnitude of the momentum)

of experiments giving bounds on speed of light variations with direction or frequency (type "speed of light" in Google Scholar), so the aether can't exist. (there are currently theories that predict variations in the speed of light like the "doubly special relativity", but at present time they're not supported by experiments).

of experiments giving bounds on speed of light variations with direction or frequency (type "speed of light" in Google Scholar), so the aether can't exist. (there are currently theories that predict variations in the speed of light like the "doubly special relativity", but at present time they're not supported by experiments).

p.s. I shouldn't remark that Schlafly, not me (or <u>'''all the others before me'''</u>), should prove his affermations, since mine are mathematical truth or facts that anyone can easily verify

p.s. I shouldn't remark that Schlafly, not me (or <u>'''all the others before me'''</u>), should prove his affermations, since mine are mathematical truth or facts that anyone can easily verify (or math that anyone can verify by himself). --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 08:51, 11 August 2011 (EDT)

(or math that anyone can verify by himself). --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 08:51, 11 August 2011 (EDT)