Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 466:
Line 466: + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 20:43, August 13, 2011
, 20:43, August 13, 2011→A point of view on this article: reply
p.s. I shouldn't remark that Schlafly, not me (or <u>'''all the others before me'''</u>), should prove his affermations, since mine are mathematical truth or facts that anyone can easily verify (or math that anyone can verify by himself). --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 08:51, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
p.s. I shouldn't remark that Schlafly, not me (or <u>'''all the others before me'''</u>), should prove his affermations, since mine are mathematical truth or facts that anyone can easily verify (or math that anyone can verify by himself). --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 08:51, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
: (7) as velocity approaches c, momentum becomes undefined rather than approaching the momentum of light
: (8) orthogonality breaks down if it is the relativistic mass, which would create logical problems
: (13) see [http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v57/i4/p2061_1] (time taken to find - 2 minutes on the internet)
: (16) Nobel Prizes are politicized - witness Barack Obama winning one despite accomplishing nothing. A true theory becomes the basis for real insights. Relativity has not.
: (26) your point does not address the claim.
: That's enough for now. Do you still have any objections to counterexamples 1-6, or 9-12?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:43, 13 August 2011 (EDT)