Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 191: Line 191:       −
Yes votes:
+
'''Yes votes:'''
    
Yes. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:44, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Yes. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:44, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
Line 199: Line 199:  
Yes.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:58, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Yes.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:58, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
   −
No votes:
+
'''No votes:'''
    
(EC) ''For near term decision making, does archiving much of this page to start things off with a new slate sound good. ''  I assume that this was a question. Answer: No, it doesn't sound good. Please archive only those sections to which no user has contributed for more than one week. Thank you. [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 13:45, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
(EC) ''For near term decision making, does archiving much of this page to start things off with a new slate sound good. ''  I assume that this was a question. Answer: No, it doesn't sound good. Please archive only those sections to which no user has contributed for more than one week. Thank you. [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 13:45, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
    
No. Attempting to bury the past doesn't deal with the valid questions already present. [[User:RobertE|RobertE]] 14:31, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
No. Attempting to bury the past doesn't deal with the valid questions already present. [[User:RobertE|RobertE]] 14:31, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits

Navigation menu