Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 70: Line 70:     
:::::::::Jab512, the evidence is that of an ocean basin.  That's the starting point for any objective analysis.  No river has ever been known to carve a shape like an ocean basin; but many have been formed by being submerged completely in water.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:47, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::::Jab512, the evidence is that of an ocean basin.  That's the starting point for any objective analysis.  No river has ever been known to carve a shape like an ocean basin; but many have been formed by being submerged completely in water.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:47, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
::::::::::How is that the starting point for any objective analysis? There is no conclusion in a starting point of an objective analysis. That's why it's objective. But i digress."''No river has ever been known to carve a shape like an ocean basin''" and you know this how? Please provide evidence to back up this statement. You say the GC is consistent in shape with an ocean basin? How do you think those are formed? Wouldn't happen to be erosion over time would it?--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 23:52, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
94

edits

Navigation menu