Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 65: Line 65:     
:::::::Courses of rivers may change from time to time, but their shapes never correspond to the shape of the Grand Canyon.  But ocean basins do.  Does the evidence matter, or not?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:43, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::Courses of rivers may change from time to time, but their shapes never correspond to the shape of the Grand Canyon.  But ocean basins do.  Does the evidence matter, or not?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:43, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
−
::::::::@JCW, there would be far more than a whole in the ground if that amount of force was "punched" into the earth. The meteor that killed off the dinosaurs had drastic global effects, and even it did not have the amount to force necessary to create a canyon of that size.
+
::::::::@JCW, there would be far more than a hole in the ground if that amount of force was "punched" into the earth. The meteor that killed off the dinosaurs had drastic global effects, and even it did not have the amount to force necessary to create a canyon of that size.
    
::::::::@Aschlafly, where did you get this "evidence" that the rivers have never corresponded to the shape of the Grand Canyon?  The river moved all over the area, slowly eroding it away piece by piece. Nobody is claiming that it was eroded by a river the exact shape that it is now.--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 23:41, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::::@Aschlafly, where did you get this "evidence" that the rivers have never corresponded to the shape of the Grand Canyon?  The river moved all over the area, slowly eroding it away piece by piece. Nobody is claiming that it was eroded by a river the exact shape that it is now.--[[User:Jab512|Jab512]] 23:41, 12 August 2011 (EDT)
94

edits

Navigation menu