SkipCaptcha
3,261
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + +
User talk:DMorris/Blocking Proposal (view source)
Revision as of 16:18, August 17, 2011
, 16:18, August 17, 2011→User:JamesWilson's Feedback: additional reply
==[[User:JamesWilson]]'s Feedback==
==[[User:JamesWilson]]'s Feedback==
I don't know about mimicking Wikipedia's blocking policies. They are (somewhat) effective for Wikipedia, but they wouldn't seem to be practical here. I mean, giving three warnings for blatant vandalism? That doesn't seem to be at all practical in dealing with people who are just here to cause trouble.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 12:04, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
I don't know about mimicking Wikipedia's blocking policies. They are (somewhat) effective for Wikipedia, but they wouldn't seem to be practical here. I mean, giving three warnings for blatant vandalism? That doesn't seem to be at all practical in dealing with people who are just here to cause trouble. And about malicious vandalism, do you want the same warnings or a block?
Also, what exactly is an abuse report? Excuse my incompetence, but I am not familiar with the term. .--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 12:04, 17 August 2011 (EDT)