SkipCaptcha
3,261
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
User talk:DMorris/Blocking Proposal (view source)
Revision as of 00:40, August 18, 2011
, 00:40, August 18, 2011→User:JamesWilson's Feedback: reply
:At a sysop's descretion, we could give just one warning before blocking in cases of blatant vandalism, just as Wikipedia does. We need to take a lesson in assuming good faith if we want to improve our user base.
:At a sysop's descretion, we could give just one warning before blocking in cases of blatant vandalism, just as Wikipedia does. We need to take a lesson in assuming good faith if we want to improve our user base.
:An abuse report is a complaint submitted to an ISP or IT department about something bad on the Internet, like wiki vandalism. Karajou and I have been finding success in dealing with trolls in this way. JPatt has also witnessed the effectiveness. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 20:35, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
:An abuse report is a complaint submitted to an ISP or IT department about something bad on the Internet, like wiki vandalism. Karajou and I have been finding success in dealing with trolls in this way. JPatt has also witnessed the effectiveness. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 20:35, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
::I suppose you're right about assuming good faith. I've just noticed Wikipedia doling out multiple warnings to users who are obviously not there to help their site, and that's why I made that comment. And thanks for telling me what that was. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 20:40, 17 August 2011 (EDT)