Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(edit overwrite, will comment on user's talk page) It's a common misconception that Relativity explains all of Maxwell's equations. In fact, Relativity is contradicted by an induction experiment, ...
Line 659: Line 659:  
:::: Yes, nearly everyone defined Relativity to include Maxwells equations. Einstein certainly did. To him, the whole point of special relativity was to get a better understanding of Maxwells equations. Maxwells theory was the first relativistic theory, and Maxwell was the first relativist. I don't know how anyone could reject relativity without rejecting nearly everything we know about electromagnetism. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:53, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:::: Yes, nearly everyone defined Relativity to include Maxwells equations. Einstein certainly did. To him, the whole point of special relativity was to get a better understanding of Maxwells equations. Maxwells theory was the first relativistic theory, and Maxwell was the first relativist. I don't know how anyone could reject relativity without rejecting nearly everything we know about electromagnetism. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:53, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
   −
:::::RSchalfly, maybe it's a good idea asking to you: how did ASchlafly become so irrationally obsessed by relativity?
+
::::: I agree with your point about Poincare developing and understanding the equations.  Poincare was perhaps one of the top twenty geniuses of all time.  But I also think he was smart enough to be skeptical about whether the mathematical theory described physical reality!
−
:::::ASchlafly: what about points (7), (8), (13), (16), (26), (32) and (33)?  Have you found some citations? If not, I think you can delete these points, so we can talk about, for example, miracles. --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 10:12, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
+
 
 +
::::: It's a common misconception that Relativity explains all of Maxwell's equations.  In fact, Relativity is contradicted by an induction experiment, which I've added as counterexample #36, with a reference.  I've seen at least one other paper talking about this problem, but of course most American (liberal) academics avoid talking about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:19, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
    
This will be my final posting here.  I apologize for its length.
 
This will be my final posting here.  I apologize for its length.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Navigation menu