1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 662:
Line 662: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 16:03, August 20, 2011
, 16:03, August 20, 2011→Attempt at Helping the Consensus Along: Relativity teaches that motion is relative
::::: It's a common misconception that Relativity explains all of Maxwell's equations. In fact, Relativity is contradicted by an induction experiment, which I've added as counterexample #36, with a reference. I've seen at least one other paper talking about this problem, but of course most American (liberal) academics avoid talking about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:19, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
::::: It's a common misconception that Relativity explains all of Maxwell's equations. In fact, Relativity is contradicted by an induction experiment, which I've added as counterexample #36, with a reference. I've seen at least one other paper talking about this problem, but of course most American (liberal) academics avoid talking about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:19, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::: Your reference says, "it is obvious that the electric filed directions in these two graphs are opposite, which is the inevitable result because Einstein haven’t pointed out clearly which one is the true moving and which one is the false one.", and that a followup paper will answer explanation is correct. Of course Einstein did not say which one is truly moving because Relativity teaches that motion is relative. The article is incoherent nonsense. Magnetic induction is explained in every textbook since Faraday. Poincare explained it also. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:03, 20 August 2011 (EDT)
This will be my final posting here. I apologize for its length.
This will be my final posting here. I apologize for its length.