233
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 973:
Line 973: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 01:10, August 27, 2011
, 01:10, August 27, 2011→The variability of the speed of light as a counterexample to relativity requires a 2-billion-year-old universe
Aschlafly, on the counterexamples to relativity page you made the argument that the speed of light was not constant based on [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html this study], which argues that the speed of light might have been different 2 billion years ago. How does this reconcile with an young universe? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
Aschlafly, on the counterexamples to relativity page you made the argument that the speed of light was not constant based on [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html this study], which argues that the speed of light might have been different 2 billion years ago. How does this reconcile with an young universe? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
:Straightforwardly. The scientists who studied the changing speed of light are no doubt evolutionists, so they naturally think and speak in terms of an old universe. Their specific finding relating to the variability of the speed of light can be sound despite the false framework in which they understand it. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 21:07, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
:Straightforwardly. The scientists who studied the changing speed of light are no doubt evolutionists, so they naturally think and speak in terms of an old universe. Their specific finding relating to the variability of the speed of light can be sound despite the false framework in which they understand it. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 21:07, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
:::So their entire conceptual framework is flawed, but their findings within a completely flawed framework are valid, only they can't see that their data--which relies on years measured in hard numbers--that gives them the correct findings is fundamentally flawed because of their conceptual framework? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:10, 26 August 2011 (EDT)
== Groundwater and entropy ==
== Groundwater and entropy ==