SkipCaptcha
1,125
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + +
→Your comment: new section
::::Interestingly enough, a LOT of people are anti-vietnam, more or less justified in how one of our main goals was to keep vietnam-southern edition alive. And that in no way means all history teachers are biased. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:04, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
::::Interestingly enough, a LOT of people are anti-vietnam, more or less justified in how one of our main goals was to keep vietnam-southern edition alive. And that in no way means all history teachers are biased. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:04, 12 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::I think the Vietnam war was a stupid pointless waste of time as well, but he lied about why we were there and what we did while we were there. All the history teachers I ever had were liberally biased. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 19:33, 14 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::I think the Vietnam war was a stupid pointless waste of time as well, but he lied about why we were there and what we did while we were there. All the history teachers I ever had were liberally biased. [[User:TerryB|TerryB]] 19:33, 14 June 2011 (EDT)
== Your comment ==
[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=113357&diff=908020&oldid=908018 You comment was removed] and while I don't support the removal of your comment perhaps you can make the same point but using better language plus add your reasoning? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 00:00, 31 August 2011 (EDT)