Changes

Luckily I know for sure that the universe isn't expanding a bit, and what's more, it never did. It was forever like that. The [[Perfect cosmological principle]] in action. That's why I may answer all kinds of questions truthfully not worrying that I fail not to explain anything adequately. Such sure knowledge is called [[science]] despite it is known also as ''never being sure''.  

Luckily I know for sure that the universe isn't expanding a bit, and what's more, it never did. It was forever like that. The [[Perfect cosmological principle]] in action. That's why I may answer all kinds of questions truthfully not worrying that I fail not to explain anything adequately. Such sure knowledge is called [[science]] despite it is known also as ''never being sure''.  

===So how come then it is science?===

===So how come then, the lack of expansion, is science?===

That's the fate of science. It is never sure. It can change any time when new data comes in and can't be fit into the old frame. [[Science]] works only on faith that what we "know" from other people is true. Then we have to evaluate our knowledge. How sure it is. It turns out to be a matter of probability that what we "know" is true.  

That's the fate of science. It is never sure. It can change any time when new data comes in and can't be fit into the old frame. Science works only on faith that what one "knows" from other people is true. Then one has to evaluate the knowledge. How sure it is. It turns out to be a matter of probability that what one "knows" is true.  

In some cases the probability is so high that we assume it as being a "sure thing". That's why I say that the universe is not expanding. And that it is science. I simply have a reason, about which other people, who think that the universe is expanding, don't know. And I know what other people don't, only since some article that described this "truth" aren't published yet. Had they been published everybody would now the same thing. That there is no reason for the universe to expand. And plenty reasons not to. This part is called ''"checking your data"''. I happened to know what is true about the expansion of universe since I ''checked my data''. That much about the scientific truth.

 

In some cases the probability is so high that one assumes it as being a "sure thing". That's why I say that the universe is not expanding. And that it is still science. I simply have a reason, about which other people, who think that the universe is expanding, don't know. And I know what other people don't know since some article that described this "truth" aren't published yet. Had they been published everybody would now that the universe is not expanding, and that there is no reason for the universe to expand. The apparent reasons are only an illusion.  

 

This part is called ''"checking your data"''. I happened to know what is true about the expansion of universe since I ''checked my data'' to a sufficient degree to tell what is not true. Science, not being able to present positive proof is quite able to reject what is not true. And so it is the main mode of its operation: rejection what's false. That's why what I know is science (since I know which part is false , that can be proven with simple math. In which math is good: in rejecting false reasons for something being true.

 

I'm supported in my faith by Richard P. Feynman whose ''"Feynman lectures on physics"'' I read and believed. So I'm a kind of believer, at least in the existence of objective truth. That's why reading characterisation of [[relativists]] I have no reason not to believe Feynman.

===Why then the universe looks like expanding?===

===Why then the universe looks like expanding?===