Changes

===Why then the universe looks like expanding?===

===Why then the universe looks like expanding?===

The implied answer is known for about a century. Folks just don't pay attention. Astropysicists never even calculated how much there is of "intrinsic redshift" before jumping to conclusion that it is "exspanding".  

The implied answer is known for about a century. Folks just don't pay attention. Astrophysicists never even calculated how much there is of "[[intrinsic redshift]]" before jumping to conclusion that it is "expanding". Had they checked, the history of science would have avoided the embarrassment of astronomers<ref>I've seen an appeal of an astronomer to Carl Sagan to end this scandal with Big Bang since ''"it makes all astronomers look like idiots"'', but the Big Bang lobby of [[relativists]] turned out to be stronger, or Carl Sagan didn't know that the Big Bang is a fake.</ref>  and the lame hypothesis that it is expanding.

The univese looks like expanding since the time in space is coupled to the [[curvature of space]] and as a result the proper time in deep space galaxies runs slower than in our Galaxy. That's the big mystery.

The univese looks like expanding since the time in space is coupled to the [[curvature of space]] and as a result the proper time in deep space galaxies runs slower than in our Galaxy. That's the whole story.

Even the Newtonian gravitation requires it, as it is shown in the [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]]. Since it was never printed for being too simple a few people realize that it is the whole truth.  

Even the Newtonian gravitation requires intrinsic redshift as a effect of relativistic [[dynamical friction]] as it is shown in the [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]]. Since it was never printed a few people realise that it is the whole truth.  

So the gravitation is slightly  different than what the contemporary cosmologists and astrophysicists, who belive them, think.  

So the gravitation is slightly  different than what the contemporary cosmologists and astrophysicists, who belive them, think.  

The most prominent difference is flat spacetime proposed already in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]] so there are also people who can discover the truth with looking and thinking only<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the Big Bang hypothesis. Probably one of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics. And it happens almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it already though with nobody, aspecially astronomers, paying any attention).

The most prominent difference is flat spacetime proposed already in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]] so there are also people who can discover the truth with looking and thinking only<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the Big Bang hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics. And it happens almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it already as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, aspecially astronomers, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki.

The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).  

The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below).