231
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 287:
Line 287: + + + + + +
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)
Revision as of 21:03, September 5, 2011
, 21:03, September 5, 2011no edit summary
: How about adding it as an alternative question on the same line, without erasing the original? The advantages of the original question is that it is historical, not speculative.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:19, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
: How about adding it as an alternative question on the same line, without erasing the original? The advantages of the original question is that it is historical, not speculative.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:19, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
::That is what I meant, wasn't as clear as it could've been, but that is what I meant. - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 02:16, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
::That is what I meant, wasn't as clear as it could've been, but that is what I meant. - [[User:JamesCA|JamesCA]] 02:16, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
== Objectivity ==
Wouldn't it be better to ask more objective questions ? For example by replacing
* Do you think that evolution must have occurred?
by
* Do you think that evolution '''or''' creation must have occurred?