635
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + +
Talk:Biblical Law Discussions (view source)
Revision as of 05:41, April 7, 2007
, 05:41, April 7, 2007no edit summary
Any ideas? [[User:Jdmeans|Jdmeans]] 00:53, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Any ideas? [[User:Jdmeans|Jdmeans]] 00:53, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:What recourse did the woman so situated have? Both husbands found "some indecency" in her, but we're not told what that actually means, was there anyways to restore her name and reputation?
:I think, though, the point of the article is missed, as it seems to infer that Jesus thought the Bible of His day was flawed (in, at least) this one area. This could be bad for people of a fundamental outlook on the Bible, that is the "all or nothing" crowd. [[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 01:41, 7 April 2007 (EDT)