233
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (M) (view source)
Revision as of 20:13, September 6, 2011
, 20:13, September 6, 2011no edit summary
::Perhaps you're unfamiliar with the way a dictionary works, but they very much do rely on references, namely by giving documented evidence of words being used in a particular manner. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 15:51, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
::Perhaps you're unfamiliar with the way a dictionary works, but they very much do rely on references, namely by giving documented evidence of words being used in a particular manner. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 15:51, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Perhaps you should argue against the facts that I have presented rather than using straw men. Don't deny the truth, liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want. I don't know what you mean by "parody," this isn't supposed to be funny. How can you be "over the top" if you are presenting facts? --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:07, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
:::Perhaps you should argue against the facts that I have presented rather than using straw men. Don't deny the truth, liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want. I don't know what you mean by "parody," this isn't supposed to be funny. How can you be "over the top" if you are presenting facts? --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:07, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::Can you show me a credible liberal campaign to allow "man to marry beast?" [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 16:13, 6 September 2011 (EDT)