102
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + + − So, Jeffery, that would be a "no," then, right? Thanks. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 22:08, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (W) (view source)
Revision as of 02:11, September 8, 2011
, 02:11, September 8, 2011no edit summary
::::And you can document that liberals want to "omit that meaning"? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:23, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
::::And you can document that liberals want to "omit that meaning"? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:23, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::It's a well-known liberal [[Secularized language|tactic]] to redefine language to suit their own [[Liberal deceit|agenda]]. They do this to turn people away from Christ and in this specific case, to promote the misguided idea of [[multiculturalism]]. The liberalizatuin of language is rampant, and I thank God that this project exists to combat that. --[[User:JefferyA|JefferyA]] 22:02, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::It's a well-known liberal [[Secularized language|tactic]] to redefine language to suit their own [[Liberal deceit|agenda]]. They do this to turn people away from Christ and in this specific case, to promote the misguided idea of [[multiculturalism]]. The liberalizatuin of language is rampant, and I thank God that this project exists to combat that. --[[User:JefferyA|JefferyA]] 22:02, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
So, Jeffery, that would be a "no," then, right? Thanks. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 22:08, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::So which came first, houses, or defensive walls? Because those house walls had to be there in a permanent way for a defensive wall to be practical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:06, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::So which came first, houses, or defensive walls? Because those house walls had to be there in a permanent way for a defensive wall to be practical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:06, 7 September 2011 (EDT)