Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Undo revision 911752 by JefferyA (talk)
Line 7: Line 7:  
::::And you can document that liberals want to "omit that meaning"? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:23, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::::And you can document that liberals want to "omit that meaning"? [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:23, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::It's a well-known liberal [[Secularized language|tactic]] to redefine language to suit their own [[Liberal deceit|agenda]].  They do this to turn people away from Christ and in this specific case, to promote the misguided idea of [[multiculturalism]].  The liberalizatuin of language is rampant, and I thank God that this project exists to combat that.  --[[User:JefferyA|JefferyA]] 22:02, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::It's a well-known liberal [[Secularized language|tactic]] to redefine language to suit their own [[Liberal deceit|agenda]].  They do this to turn people away from Christ and in this specific case, to promote the misguided idea of [[multiculturalism]].  The liberalizatuin of language is rampant, and I thank God that this project exists to combat that.  --[[User:JefferyA|JefferyA]] 22:02, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
−
:::::::So which came first, houses, or defensive walls? Because those house walls had to be there in a permanent way for a defensive wall to be practical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:06, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
+
 
 +
So, Jeffery, that would be a "no," then, right? Thanks. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 22:08, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::So which came first, houses, or defensive walls? Because those house walls had to be there in a permanent way for a defensive wall to be practical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:06, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::So which came first, houses, or defensive walls? Because those house walls had to be there in a permanent way for a defensive wall to be practical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:06, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
966

edits

Navigation menu