Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: − + Line 163:
Line 163: +
Talk:Question evolution! campaign (view source)
Revision as of 02:28, September 14, 2011
, 02:28, September 14, 2011→A Biologist's Response to the "15 Questions"
::::::FRodgers and ARamis are like typical evolutionists, argument by empty assertion. For example, how does the price of the question evolution printed t-shirts in the usa compare with other printed t-shirts? I noticed that zazzle charges twice as much for a printed t-shirt. Also, why does CMI allow people to print up their own t-shirts using their design if their purpose was to sell t-shirts? You case is non-existent. :) You can start whining about the supposed costly tracts now. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:55, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
::::::FRodgers and ARamis are like typical evolutionists, argument by empty assertion. For example, how does the price of the question evolution printed t-shirts in the usa compare with other printed t-shirts? I noticed that zazzle charges twice as much for a printed t-shirt. Also, why does CMI allow people to print up their own t-shirts using their design if their purpose was to sell t-shirts? You case is non-existent. :) You can start whining about the supposed costly tracts now. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:55, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::That answers that but, outside of the branding talk (I care not for t-shirts - I always wear collars!), lets make a [[Creationary Scientific Breakthroughs]] article. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:13, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::That answers that but, outside of the branding talk (I care not for t-shirts - I always wear collars!), lets make a [[Creationary Scientific Breakthroughs]] article. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:13, 8 September 2011 (EDT)
==A Biologist's Answers to the "15 Questions"==
==A Biologist's Response to the "15 Questions"==
1. '''How did life originate?'''
1. '''How did life originate?'''
--[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 20:31, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
--[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 20:31, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
::To RudrickBoucher, the purported biologist: I merely looked at the beginning of your response and already saw unclear, unsupported and unreasonable assertions. You wrote: "Truthfully, '''we''' don't know. Science is built upon repeatable evidence as provided by observation and experimentation. There is very little evidence, one way or the other, regarding the exact mechanism of the origin of life. Science cannot rely on dogma, and the '''existence of scripture is hardly evidence in support of divine creation'''; therefore the most scientifically sound answer here, relying on the evidence, is that we do not conclusively know." First, who is "we" and why is it that we supposedly don't know. Second, you failed to refute the [[Christian apologetics|significant amount of evidence supporting Christianity and the Bible]] (I suggest reading the page, its citations and the external links given). Instead, you "argued" by mere assertion. Given the inauspicious and unsupported beginning to your response, I can't say I read the rest of it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:28, 13 September 2011 (EDT)