| − | ::To RudrickBoucher, the purported biologist: I merely looked at the beginning of your response and already saw unclear, unsupported and unreasonable assertions. You wrote: "Truthfully, '''we''' don't know. Science is built upon repeatable evidence as provided by observation and experimentation. There is very little evidence, one way or the other, regarding the exact mechanism of the origin of life. Science cannot rely on dogma, and the '''existence of scripture is hardly evidence in support of divine creation'''; therefore the most scientifically sound answer here, relying on the evidence, is that we do not conclusively know." First, who is "we" and why is it that we supposedly don't know. Second, you failed to refute the [[Christian apologetics|significant amount of evidence supporting Christianity and the Bible]] (I suggest reading the page, its citations and the external links given). Instead, you "argued" by mere assertion. Given the inauspicious and unsupported beginning to your response, I can't say I read the rest of it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:28, 13 September 2011 (EDT) | + | ::To RudrickBoucher, the purported biologist: I merely looked at the beginning of your response and already saw unclear, unsupported and unreasonable assertions. You wrote: "Truthfully, '''we''' don't know. Science is built upon repeatable evidence as provided by observation and experimentation. There is very little evidence, one way or the other, regarding the exact mechanism of the origin of life. Science cannot rely on dogma, and the '''existence of scripture is hardly evidence in support of divine creation'''; therefore the most scientifically sound answer here, relying on the evidence, is that we do not conclusively know." First, who is "we" and why is it that we supposedly don't know. Second, you failed to refute the [[Christian apologetics|significant amount of evidence supporting Christianity and the Bible]] (I suggest reading the page, its citations and the external links given). Instead, you "argued" by mere assertion. Given the unsupported and inauspicious beginning to your response, I can't say I read the rest of it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:28, 13 September 2011 (EDT) |