Changes

--[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 20:31, 13 September 2011 (EDT)

--[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 20:31, 13 September 2011 (EDT)

::To RudrickBoucher, the purported biologist:  I merely looked at the beginning of your response and already saw unclear, unsupported and unreasonable assertions. You wrote: "Truthfully, '''we''' don't know. Science is built upon repeatable evidence as provided by observation and experimentation. There is very little evidence, one way or the other, regarding the exact mechanism of the origin of life. Science cannot rely on dogma, and the '''existence of scripture is hardly evidence in support of divine creation'''; therefore the most scientifically sound answer here, relying on the evidence, is that we do not conclusively know." First, who is "we" and why is it that we supposedly don't know. Second, you failed to refute the [[Christian apologetics|significant amount of evidence supporting Christianity and the Bible]] (I suggest reading the page, its citations and the external links given).  Instead, you "argued" by mere assertion. Given the  unsupported and inauspicious beginning to your response, I can't say I read the rest of it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:28, 13 September 2011 (EDT)

::To RudrickBoucher, the purported biologist:  I merely looked at the beginning of your response and already saw unclear, unsupported and unreasonable assertions. You wrote: "Truthfully, '''we''' don't know. Science is built upon repeatable evidence as provided by observation and experimentation. There is very little evidence, one way or the other, regarding the exact mechanism of the origin of life. Science cannot rely on dogma, and the '''existence of scripture is hardly evidence in support of divine creation'''; therefore the most scientifically sound answer here, relying on the evidence, is that we do not conclusively know." First, who is "we" and why is it that we supposedly don't know. Second, you failed to refute the [[Christian apologetics|significant amount of evidence supporting Christianity and the Bible]] (I suggest reading the page, its citations and the external links given).  Also, you failed to address [[intelligent design]] and [[creation science]] theorists arguments concerning the beginning of life. Instead, you "argued" by mere assertion. Given the  unsupported and inauspicious beginning to your response, I can't say I read the rest of it. By the way, given your apparent penchant to argue by mere assertion and your apparent penchant to commit the exclusion fallacy,  are you an atheist? If so, what proof and evidence do you have that atheism is true. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:35, 13 September 2011 (EDT)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:28, 13 September 2011 (EDT)