539
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 183:
Line 183: +
Talk:Question evolution! campaign (view source)
Revision as of 14:04, September 17, 2011
, 14:04, September 17, 2011→A Response to the "15 Questions" from a biology student
:::::::::Conservative, if you are so confident in your own arguments, I suggest you read all of mine; that is, unless you're afraid it might challenge your own dogmatic beliefs... --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 22:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::Conservative, if you are so confident in your own arguments, I suggest you read all of mine; that is, unless you're afraid it might challenge your own dogmatic beliefs... --[[User:RudrickBoucher|RudrickBoucher]] 22:57, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
::Rudrick, judging by your response to question #1 and my rebuttals, I don't believe you are making arguments. I would prefer to spend my time addressing bona fide arguments. For example as far as my rebuttals, and I am just giving one example, you have yet to show anything happens "by chance" nor are you admitting error on this point. Jesus said, "He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much. (Luke 16:10). If you have shown yourself unfaithful in your response to question #1 and my rebuttals of your response to question #1, then why should I assume your "responses" to questions 2 through 15 are any better? At least thus far, you are showing yourself to be stubborn and proud person who is not amenable to correction. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
::Rudrick, judging by your response to question #1 and my rebuttals, I don't believe you are making arguments. I would prefer to spend my time addressing bona fide arguments. For example as far as my rebuttals, and I am just giving one example, you have yet to show anything happens "by chance" nor are you admitting error on this point. Jesus said, "He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much. (Luke 16:10). If you have shown yourself unfaithful in your response to question #1 and my rebuttals of your response to question #1, then why should I assume your "responses" to questions 2 through 15 are any better? At least thus far, you are showing yourself to be stubborn and proud person who is not amenable to correction. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:48, 16 September 2011 (EDT)
:::OK, let's look at his response to question 10. Ask ''any'' evolutionist that question and their reply is going to be "They don't." Now, how are you going to prove them wrong? Coelecanths? Good luck. Do you know how many fossils have been found of the living species of coelecanth, ''Latimeria chalumnae''? None. Do you know how many living specimens have been found of coelecanths known from fossils? None. Living examples of fossil Jurassic sharks? None. Fossils of modern species of horseshoe crab? None. This is a BAD QUESTION and we shouldn't be asking it of evolutionists because they can answer it EASILY. You may not be satisifed with their answer but they don't care; you asked them for an an answer provided by their theory and they can give you one which '''within the framework of the theory you are discussing''' is perfectly valid. Instead why not ask them how the Type 3 secretory system managed to simultaneously add the 42 parts needed to make a bacterial flagellum? Guess what? They CAN'T answer that. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 10:04, 17 September 2011 (EDT)
== [[Origin of life]] is part of the evolutionary paradigm ==
== [[Origin of life]] is part of the evolutionary paradigm ==