Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count? (view source)

Revision as of 01:14, January 6, 2007

617 bytes added ,  01:14, January 6, 2007
no edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:     
[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]]
 
[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]]
 +
 +
: '''Mathematical resolution:'''  Let S be the set of all acceptable entries.  I wonder if Tim is suggesting that S should not include an entry that could be a set containing itself.  In other words, is Tim saying that S should include all things A that are not elements of themselves?
 +
 +
: <math>S=\{A\mid A\not\in A\}.</math>
 +
 +
: I am compelled to ask Tim this: can his proposed set of all acceptable entries be an element of itself?  I'm afraid Tim's proposed limit on what constitutes an entry may lead to a self-contradiction.  See [[Russell's Paradox]]. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:14, 5 January 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,209

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/9185"

Navigation menu