Block, SkipCaptcha, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
5,655
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 28:
Line 28: + + +
Debate:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count? (view source)
Revision as of 02:06, January 6, 2007
, 02:06, January 6, 2007no edit summary
: I am compelled to ask Tim this: can his proposed set of all acceptable entries be an element of itself? I'm afraid Tim's proposed limit on what constitutes an entry may lead to a self-contradiction. See [[Russell's Paradox]]. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:14, 5 January 2007 (EST)
: I am compelled to ask Tim this: can his proposed set of all acceptable entries be an element of itself? I'm afraid Tim's proposed limit on what constitutes an entry may lead to a self-contradiction. See [[Russell's Paradox]]. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:14, 5 January 2007 (EST)
Ben has a very good point. Whatever the outcome of this debate, the only difference it is going to make for our Conservapedia is in one number on the main page. There are probably a little less than two hundred term list pages. Currently, this is about 1/13 of all our entries, but if Conservapedia continues to grow as it has so far, two hundred entries will be very insignificant in only a few months. Although I would like to have the term lists counted, the final outcome does not matter much at all to Conservapedia.--[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 21:06, 5 January 2007 (EST)