Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 57: Line 57:  
But it seems part of a possible trend. Those who merely pose as rationalists and promoters of liberal values are being found out.<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref>}}
 
But it seems part of a possible trend. Those who merely pose as rationalists and promoters of liberal values are being found out.<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref>}}
   −
== Richard Dawkins second explanation of his Elevatorgate scandal comments:
+
== Richard Dawkins second explanation of his Elevatorgate scandal comments ==
    
Many people seem to think it obvious that my post was wrong and I should apologise. Very few people have bothered to explain exactly why. The nearest approach I have heard goes something like this.
 
Many people seem to think it obvious that my post was wrong and I should apologise. Very few people have bothered to explain exactly why. The nearest approach I have heard goes something like this.
Line 69: Line 69:  
No, I obviously don't get it. I will gladly apologise if somebody will calmly and politely, without using the word f*** in every sentence, explain to me what it is that I am not getting.
 
No, I obviously don't get it. I will gladly apologise if somebody will calmly and politely, without using the word f*** in every sentence, explain to me what it is that I am not getting.
   −
Richard
+
Richard<ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/07/oh_no_not_againonce_more_unto.php#comment-4309418 Oh, no, not again…once more unto the breach]</ref>
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits

Navigation menu