Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 59: Line 59:  
== Richard Dawkins second explanation of his Elevatorgate scandal comments ==
 
== Richard Dawkins second explanation of his Elevatorgate scandal comments ==
 
On July 3, 2011, Richard Dawkins posted this comment on PZ Myers blog:
 
On July 3, 2011, Richard Dawkins posted this comment on PZ Myers blog:
−
Many people seem to think it obvious that my post was wrong and I should apologise. Very few people have bothered to explain exactly why. The nearest approach I have heard goes something like this.
+
{{cquote|Many people seem to think it obvious that my post was wrong and I should apologise. Very few people have bothered to explain exactly why. The nearest approach I have heard goes something like this.
    
I sarcastically compared Rebecca's plight with that of women in Muslim countries or families dominated by Muslim men. Somebody made the worthwhile point (reiterated here by PZ) that it is no defence of something slightly bad to point to something worse. We should fight all bad things, the slightly bad as well as the very bad. Fair enough. But my point is that the 'slightly bad thing' suffered by Rebecca was not even slightly bad, it was zero bad. A man asked her back to his room for coffee. She said no. End of story.
 
I sarcastically compared Rebecca's plight with that of women in Muslim countries or families dominated by Muslim men. Somebody made the worthwhile point (reiterated here by PZ) that it is no defence of something slightly bad to point to something worse. We should fight all bad things, the slightly bad as well as the very bad. Fair enough. But my point is that the 'slightly bad thing' suffered by Rebecca was not even slightly bad, it was zero bad. A man asked her back to his room for coffee. She said no. End of story.
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits

Navigation menu