Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 498: Line 498:  
:::::The history of liberal opposition to my articles [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vS8rpt1y6lk&feature=related reminds me of someone.] :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:12, 29 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::The history of liberal opposition to my articles [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vS8rpt1y6lk&feature=related reminds me of someone.] :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:12, 29 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::Just because someone has problems with your articles doesn't make them a liberal. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:14, 29 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::Just because someone has problems with your articles doesn't make them a liberal. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 21:14, 29 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
''And what harm is that? What harm is actually being done to this website? What exactly is the harm that this website is engaging in by telling the public about a disgusting sexual practice and those who promote it?'' I generally see to possible disadvantages:
 +
*the visibility of Conservapedia may suffer: ''bestiality'' isn't a word suffered well by filters, especially not by those which parents use to protect their children from the filth on the net.
 +
*''you are fat'' may be seen as a crude bit of humor, ''you are abusing animals'' less so. I assume that's the reason for which Andy deleted a section on his talk page - remember, he's a lawyer!
 +
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:24, 30 September 2011 (EDT)
    
== Andy, are you reading your Talk page? ==
 
== Andy, are you reading your Talk page? ==
221

edits

Navigation menu