13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 162:
Line 162: + + + +
→Andrew Wakefield: new section
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)
::::I don't know if "evolve" is the right term to use here. The influenza virus "mutates" (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)
::::I don't know if "evolve" is the right term to use here. The influenza virus "mutates" (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)
== Andrew Wakefield ==
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)