13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 166:
Line 166: + + + +
→Andrew Wakefield: new section
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
== Andrew Wakefield ==
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:04, 4 October 2011 (EDT)