| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | | | |
| | : Ah, yes. Well, it used to, and it may do again in the future. I assume it's a temporary bug.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:27, 12 November 2009 (EST) | | : Ah, yes. Well, it used to, and it may do again in the future. I assume it's a temporary bug.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:27, 12 November 2009 (EST) |
| − |
| |
| − | == "Decreasingly new" ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | That made me laugh. I'm going to have to steal it now. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 11:51, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Thanks Jinx - steal away! It's funny, but I've been editing here for months and somehow I do still feel like the new guy.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:59, 5 May 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Hahaha==
| |
| − | This wiki makes me laugh. Much like Fox News, it claims to be unbiased but instead portrays only one side of the situation. Can you possibly say the [[Barack Obama]] article is unbiased? Ahahahah. This wiki was supposedly created because Wikipedia was too biased in liberals' favor, but the funny thing is, this wiki is ten times more biased than Wikipedia could ever hope to be. [[User:Scarecrowk|Scarecrowk]]
| |
| − | :It's all very well to laugh, but perhaps you could work to improve what you think is lacking instead? New contributors are always welcome here.
| |
| − | :Also note that Conservapedia doesn't claim to be unbiased - it openly has a declared US conservative point of view. Otherwise it would have to be called Unbiasedopaedia!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:49, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Right. Wikipedia says "we're neutral" and then they insert and defend bias. We basically say up front "we're biased!" which is not true bias, but declared POV. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:53, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==images==
| |
| − | File:NoSmoking.png, File:Ashtray.jpg. Here are the names of the images you requested about smoking. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 23:08, 29 May 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Thanks Addison!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 14:42, 3 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Thanks! ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks for your edits this morning!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:59, 11 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : No problem - thanks for noticing!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:21, 11 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Aditional Thanks==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks for helping clean my Metallicity article, I didn't realize I left that original extra paragraph in there, was using it to organize thoughts -- [[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 15:13, 18 June 2009 [EDT]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Ok Serious now==
| |
| − | If you agree to forget the past few minutes I will be constructive. My interests include the Darwinian influence on morality and black holes.{{unsigned|Wheelchairman}}
| |
| − | :I'm not an administrator, so don't have authority to forget/not forget anything! If you'd like to improve pages on, say, [[sin]] or [[black hole]]s I'm sure that would be welcome.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:06, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == The Vandal ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | How can we get rid of the 'Wheelchairman' vandal? Could we email a sysop? [[User:JohnFraiser|JohnFraiser]] 10:01, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : You can try posting on sysops' talk pages or even emailing them, but to be honest if any were online they would probably notice the activity in "Recent changes" anyway. That leaves us with the standard tactics of reverting, ignoring or appealing to their better nature.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:06, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Gosh, I thought I appeared to be "online". I'd better have Webmaster check it! Thank goodness Joaquin spotted it. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:11, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::I didn't see you in 'recent changes'. For future reference, do you get an alert automatically if someone posts on your page?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:44, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::When your User talk page has a new edit, there should be a notice that appears in the upper right-hand corner of your screen view. That's what I see. Perhaps it is a profile setting. Alternatively, you can always click on "Watch this page" for highlighting of an edit to any page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 08:02, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::::I see a orange banner that says I have a "new" message, and links that either take me to the talk page, and another that takes me directly to the history "diff". That is how I manage to watch CP and still reduce the backlog TiVo has on it! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 08:10, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::::I get the 'new messages' banner as well - I was just wondering if the admins got alerted even if they weren't actually looking at Conservapedia at the time. We could have done with a 'bat signal' when that joker was about yesterday.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 08:29, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Vice President of the United States ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thinking about this problematic title, shouldn't the link <noinclude>[[Vice President]]</noinclude> go to an article and NOT a person, that changes or possibly does, every election cycle? --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:47, 7 July 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :That would make sense, I think. Probably better for an American to write it though - we Brits don't have a vice-Queen!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:59, 11 July 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Longest Running ==
| |
| − | User:FOIA has you beat by several months. You are the longest running Brit at CP. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:10, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Ah, I suspected there would be somebody. Thanks for the heads-up, as I believe Americans often say.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 08:42, 3 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Grammar==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&curid=2849&diff=696646&oldid=696645&rcid=762970 this correction]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:32, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | :You're welcome, although I did put the ungrammatical sentence in in the first place!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:45, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Thanks ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks for your edit to [[conservative]]! And thanks for your other superb work. I've learned from your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:10, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Quite welcome. As a Brit, I've been looking for a succinct definition to sum up US conservatism and that seemed to fit the bill.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:37, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Britain seems to be swinging back to conservatism now. I'm optimistic as entries like [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words]] indicate. Regardless, thanks again for your insights.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:28, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::It's certainly likely that the Conservative Party will win the next election, though only some of their positions would be considered conservative by American standards. They do have some ideas on deregulating state education that you might find interesting.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 12:39, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Thanks again==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I was editing [[dog meat]] at Wikipedia, and I absentmindedly inserted text for their article into our [[Windows bugs]] article. Thanks for that prompt correction; you saved me some embarassment; I looked like a graffiti artist for a moment there ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:31, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − | :Don't mention it! It did look weird, but I knew there would be an explanation.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 12:01, 18 September 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == [[Conservative Bible Project]] ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Hi, there! In case you didn't know it, I've lately taken command of this Project, under the direct authority of Mr. [[User:Aschlafly|Schlafly]]. That generally means that if you're going to participate in it, I need to know your qualifications. Here are mine: I can read ancient Greek almost as fast as I can read modern English; the only limitation I have is in vocabulary, and I have a Strong's and a Newman's Concise Dictionary.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If you would like to take on translating a whole book of the Bible, let me know. But all I ask is that people finish what they begin.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 14:59, 17 October 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Hello Terry. I have just been looking to translate one verse each day, as much as an aid to my own understanding as a contribution to the project. Is this kind of low-key activity welcome, or should contributors make a more substantial commitment before getting involved at all?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:40, 21 October 2009 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Longest basic rights ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * 01:26, 24 March 2008 [[User:JLauttamus|JLauttamus]] (Talk | contribs) New user account
| |
| − | So hah! -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:58, 10 November 2009 (EST)
| |
| − | By the way, who's the first longest-running? -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:59, 10 November 2009 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Congratulations! I'll amend the page accordingly. The other one is FOIA - I think it may be a close-run thing between the two of you.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 11:05, 12 November 2009 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::Yeah, he's got me by about 15 days. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 12:08, 12 November 2009 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::I haven't been around quite that long, but I have been around since early May 2008. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 12:45, 27 November 2009 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::Ah - thanks for letting me know. You've just got yourself a spot on the list.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:28, 2 December 2009 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::::Just to add 15:19, 20 September 2007 Able806 (Talk | contribs) New user account --[[User:Able806|Able806]] 08:32, 2 December 2009 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::::Super - it seems there's quite a few more than I thought!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 08:33, 2 December 2009 (EST)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Basic rights only == | | == Basic rights only == |