Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 90: Line 90:  
!Legislation
 
!Legislation
 
!Comments
 
!Comments
!Politics
   
|-
 
|-
 
|Virginia
 
|Virginia
Line 113: Line 112:  
|Oklahoma
 
|Oklahoma
 
|Almost nothing,<ref>Decreased from 24 to 20 weeks of pregnancy the latest time when abortion could still be performed, and prohibited abortion coverage by insurance companies except as supplemental coverage. [http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/04/20/Oklahoma-governor-signs-anti-abortion-laws/UPI-23141303346328/?rel=39521308084524]</ref> despite claiming to have the most pro-life legislature (and a pro-life governor) in the nation.  It did pass a law restricting the use of abortion-inducing drugs, but it was then blocked by a state court judge.<ref>http://bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1374536</ref>
 
|Almost nothing,<ref>Decreased from 24 to 20 weeks of pregnancy the latest time when abortion could still be performed, and prohibited abortion coverage by insurance companies except as supplemental coverage. [http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/04/20/Oklahoma-governor-signs-anti-abortion-laws/UPI-23141303346328/?rel=39521308084524]</ref> despite claiming to have the most pro-life legislature (and a pro-life governor) in the nation.  It did pass a law restricting the use of abortion-inducing drugs, but it was then blocked by a state court judge.<ref>http://bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1374536</ref>
 +
|
 
|Apparently Oklahoma voters do not yet recognize the difference between phony pro-life talk by politicians, and effective law-making.
 
|Apparently Oklahoma voters do not yet recognize the difference between phony pro-life talk by politicians, and effective law-making.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Wisconsin
 
|Wisconsin
 
|Despite having the votes to pass any conservative law, it has done nothing on the issue of abortion except slightly reduce funding for [[Planned Parenthood]]
 
|Despite having the votes to pass any conservative law, it has done nothing on the issue of abortion except slightly reduce funding for [[Planned Parenthood]]
 +
|
 
|Republicans almost lost control of the state senate in recall elections due to their lack of achievement socially, while angering voters economically.  Governor Scott Walker -- inactive on social issues -- could still be recalled.
 
|Republicans almost lost control of the state senate in recall elections due to their lack of achievement socially, while angering voters economically.  Governor Scott Walker -- inactive on social issues -- could still be recalled.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Georgia
 
|Georgia
 
|Not a single pro-life bill passed, despite the governor and many legislators winning elections by claiming to be pro-life
 
|Not a single pro-life bill passed, despite the governor and many legislators winning elections by claiming to be pro-life
 +
|
 
|Pro-life leadership in Georgia is pushing the "personhood" gimmick instead of laws that work.
 
|Pro-life leadership in Georgia is pushing the "personhood" gimmick instead of laws that work.
 
|-
 
|-
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789

edits

Navigation menu