Changes

|Oklahoma

|Oklahoma

|Almost nothing,<ref>Decreased from 24 to 20 weeks of pregnancy the latest time when abortion could still be performed, and prohibited abortion coverage by insurance companies except as supplemental coverage. [http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/04/20/Oklahoma-governor-signs-anti-abortion-laws/UPI-23141303346328/?rel=39521308084524]</ref> despite claiming to have the most pro-life legislature (and a pro-life governor) in the nation.  It did pass a law restricting the use of abortion-inducing drugs, but it was then blocked by a state court judge.<ref>http://bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1374536</ref>

|Almost nothing,<ref>Decreased from 24 to 20 weeks of pregnancy the latest time when abortion could still be performed, and prohibited abortion coverage by insurance companies except as supplemental coverage. [http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/04/20/Oklahoma-governor-signs-anti-abortion-laws/UPI-23141303346328/?rel=39521308084524]</ref> despite claiming to have the most pro-life legislature (and a pro-life governor) in the nation.  It did pass a law restricting the use of abortion-inducing drugs, but it was then blocked by a state court judge.<ref>http://bostonherald.com/news/national/south/view.bg?articleid=1374536</ref>

|Apparently Oklahoma voters do not yet recognize the difference between phony pro-life talk by politicians, and effective law-making.

|Apparently Oklahoma voters do not yet recognize the difference between phony pro-life talk by politicians, and effective law-making.

|-

|-

|Wisconsin

|Wisconsin

|Despite having the votes to pass any conservative law, it has done nothing on the issue of abortion except slightly reduce funding for [[Planned Parenthood]]

|Despite having the votes to pass any conservative law, it has done nothing on the issue of abortion except slightly reduce funding for [[Planned Parenthood]]

|Republicans almost lost control of the state senate in recall elections due to their lack of achievement socially, while angering voters economically.  Governor Scott Walker -- inactive on social issues -- could still be recalled.

|Republicans almost lost control of the state senate in recall elections due to their lack of achievement socially, while angering voters economically.  Governor Scott Walker -- inactive on social issues -- could still be recalled.

|-

|-

|Georgia

|Georgia

|Not a single pro-life bill passed, despite the governor and many legislators winning elections by claiming to be pro-life

|Not a single pro-life bill passed, despite the governor and many legislators winning elections by claiming to be pro-life

|Pro-life leadership in Georgia is pushing the "personhood" gimmick instead of laws that work.

|Pro-life leadership in Georgia is pushing the "personhood" gimmick instead of laws that work.

|-

|-

|Florida

|Florida

|a weak ultrasound bill (patients can be coached to decline seeing images), a ban on insurance coverage for abortion in a future [[ObamaCare]] State exchange, and restrictions on bypass of parental notification for abortions by underage girls; a ban on abortion funding was set for going on the ballot in 2012

|a weak ultrasound bill (patients can be coached to decline seeing images), a ban on insurance coverage for abortion in a future [[ObamaCare]] State exchange, and restrictions on bypass of parental notification for abortions by underage girls; a ban on abortion funding was set for going on the ballot in 2012

|Lots of fanfare, but not much achieved

|Lots of fanfare, but not much achieved.  Is this the best an all-Republican statehouse and governor can do?

|Is this the best an all-Republican statehouse and governor can do?

|-

|-

|Hawaii

|Hawaii