364
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + + +
no edit summary
I actually have no problem with Leviticus. I just wish to point out that a prohibition against what are now know to be fictional beings is not that interesting. Perhaps wizards were more of a problem then. The other phrases are to give context to the prohibition. Leviticus has lots of laws, and perhaps some people think they can pick and chose, others do not believe you can. If the commandments of Leviticus are to be taken seriously, you must also look at Leviticus 20:9.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 20:36, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
I actually have no problem with Leviticus. I just wish to point out that a prohibition against what are now know to be fictional beings is not that interesting. Perhaps wizards were more of a problem then. The other phrases are to give context to the prohibition. Leviticus has lots of laws, and perhaps some people think they can pick and chose, others do not believe you can. If the commandments of Leviticus are to be taken seriously, you must also look at Leviticus 20:9.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 20:36, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
:Think of it like this: Why would God specifically warn us against something that was fictional?
:Just because wizards are a popular feature in fictional stories, it doesn't follow that wizards themselves are fictional. That's faulty logic, especially when we have God himself telling us they aren't! --[[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 07:05, 8 April 2007 (EDT)