Changes

Despite what his spokesperson says he was found guilty of ethics violation and had to pay a $300,000 fine. The panel found that he violated Rule 42 many times. The last three charges were dropped, as his spokesman said, in 1998 but not because they were without merit. The committee found that there was no evidence that he was still violating the rule and saw no reason to impose further sanctions.<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/leadership/stories/101198.htm</ref><ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/leadership/stories/gingrich123198.htm</ref> I'm going to remove the quote from his spokesperson. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 14:04, 29 November 2011 (EST)

Despite what his spokesperson says he was found guilty of ethics violation and had to pay a $300,000 fine. The panel found that he violated Rule 42 many times. The last three charges were dropped, as his spokesman said, in 1998 but not because they were without merit. The committee found that there was no evidence that he was still violating the rule and saw no reason to impose further sanctions.<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/leadership/stories/101198.htm</ref><ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/leadership/stories/gingrich123198.htm</ref> I'm going to remove the quote from his spokesperson. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 14:04, 29 November 2011 (EST)