Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by GregG (talk) to last revision by AlejandroH
Line 26: Line 26:     
=== Defendants ===
 
=== Defendants ===
−
The defendants were the Dover Area School District and the Dover Area School District Board of Directors.  The Board presided over schools in the Dover area that taught approximately 3700 students. About 1000 students attended Dover High School, the school where the ID policy was to be implemented (in fact, the statement was read to students by an administrator because the teachers refused to read the statement on the grounds that doing so would violate Pennsylvania's code of ethics for educators<ref>''Kitzmiller'', slip op. at pp. 127-28</ref>). The Defendants retained the services of the Thomas Moore Law Center on a pro bono basis.<ref name="Memo" /><ref name="NYD">http://yorkdispatch.inyork.com/searchresults/ci_3535139</ref>
+
The defendants were the Dover Area School District and the Dover Area School District Board of Directors.  The Board presided over schools in the Dover area that taught approximately 3700 students. About 1000 students attended Dover High School, the school where the ID policy was to be implemented (in fact, the statement never was read to students by teachers). The Defendants retained the services of the Thomas Moore Law Center on a pro bono basis.<ref name="Memo" /><ref name="NYD">http://yorkdispatch.inyork.com/searchresults/ci_3535139</ref>
    
=== Endorsement and Lemon Tests ===
 
=== Endorsement and Lemon Tests ===
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,597

edits

Navigation menu