10
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 108:
Line 108: +
Talk:Occupy Wall Street (view source)
Revision as of 15:32, December 31, 2011
, 15:32, December 31, 2011→more realistic article
For example, in one city that I am aware of the city/police have largely chosen to ignore the protestors because they don't want to give them any publicity or get the city involved in any legal disputes plus the city politicians don't want to lose any votes on the left. Also, the protestors aren't really causing many problems. In short, the city is taking a live and let live policy and the protestors aren't making pests of themselves. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:06, 31 December 2011 (EST)
For example, in one city that I am aware of the city/police have largely chosen to ignore the protestors because they don't want to give them any publicity or get the city involved in any legal disputes plus the city politicians don't want to lose any votes on the left. Also, the protestors aren't really causing many problems. In short, the city is taking a live and let live policy and the protestors aren't making pests of themselves. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:06, 31 December 2011 (EST)
:Would these sane rules also apply to fat atheists that do the nasty with goats, kills babies and Jews? --[[User:NatalyP|NatalyP]] 10:32, 31 December 2011 (EST)