Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎That particular definition: debate over whether "science" is allowed to tread into the areas of philosophy, metaphysics or religion
Line 68: Line 68:     
:: The article does not say that it is just about scientific aspects of evolution. People often discuss nonscientific aspects, and it is misleading to avoid them. The deleted text should go back in. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:21, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:: The article does not say that it is just about scientific aspects of evolution. People often discuss nonscientific aspects, and it is misleading to avoid them. The deleted text should go back in. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:21, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::RSchlafly is not off-topic at all. There is considerable debate over whether "science" is allowed to tread into the areas of [[philosophy]], [[metaphysics]] or [[religion]]. And [[methodologicial naturalism]] makes a statement about the scope of science, i.e., whether it can cope with the [[supernatural]] - this leads to the recent unpleasantness about [[Intelligent Design]]. (We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto!) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:25, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
    
== Gradual appearance of new forms of life ==
 
== Gradual appearance of new forms of life ==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu