Changes

|}

|}

Actually, User:Conservative, according to the Conservapedian definition of what a scientist is. You seem to be attacking his character, since you have absolutely no way of actually arguing with him on any respectable level. Its almost as if you are so desperate for a way to undermine something he says, you are willing to use a rhetorical concession of alleged pretentiousness made many months ago in an attempt to discourage his efforts in poking even more holes into the Swiss cheese of arguments against evolution.  

Actually, User:Conservative, according to the Conservapedian definition of what a scientist is, Mr. Boucher is indeed a biologist. You seem to be attacking his character, since you have absolutely no way of actually arguing with him on any respectable level. Its almost as if you are so desperate for a way to undermine something he says, you are willing to use a rhetorical concession of alleged pretentiousness made many months ago in an attempt to discourage his efforts in poking even more holes into the Swiss cheese of arguments against evolution.  

Its almost as if the Question Evolution campaign is completely indefensible, so rather than make reasonable concessions, it is easier to just ignore and dismiss arguments. Unfortunately, that wont work this time. A block would be way to obvious, and would destroy any pretense of Conservapedia being anything other than an echo chamber. So instead, you make exceedingly pathetic attacks against Mr. Boucher's scientific prowess, in an attempt to preclude the inevitable thrashing he will deliver unto the Question Evolution! Campaign.  Mr. Boucher isn't some evolutionist off of YouTube you can quote mine, and he's not a High School Freshman halfway through his first semester of biology. He is an actual scientist, by all '''objective''' measures, something that is not up for debate, and you are in quite the creationist pickle. So continue making all the pathetic, deceitful attacks you want, it doesn't make Mr. Boucher any less of a scientist, and dosn't make the Question Evolution! campain any less of a load of crap. [[User:LiesandDeciet|LiesandDeciet]] 09:14, 13 January 2012 (EST)

Its almost as if the Question Evolution campaign is completely indefensible, so rather than make reasonable concessions, it is easier to just ignore and dismiss arguments. Unfortunately, that wont work this time. A block would be way to obvious, and would destroy any pretense of Conservapedia being anything other than an echo chamber. So instead, you make exceedingly pathetic attacks against Mr. Boucher's scientific prowess, in an attempt to preclude the inevitable thrashing he will deliver unto the Question Evolution! Campaign.  Mr. Boucher isn't some evolutionist off of YouTube you can quote mine, and he's not a High School Freshman halfway through his first semester of biology. He is an actual scientist, by all '''objective''' measures, something that is not up for debate, and you are in quite the creationist pickle. So continue making all the pathetic, deceitful attacks you want, it doesn't make Mr. Boucher any less of a scientist, and dosn't make the Question Evolution! campain any less of a load of crap. [[User:LiesandDeciet|LiesandDeciet]] 09:14, 13 January 2012 (EST)