SkipCaptcha
3,261
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 133:
Line 133: − − Actually, User:Conservative, according to the Conservapedian definition of what a scientist is, Mr. Boucher is indeed a biologist. You seem to be attacking his character, since you have absolutely no way of actually arguing with him on any respectable level. Its almost as if you are so desperate for a way to undermine something he says, you are willing to use a rhetorical concession of alleged pretentiousness made many months ago in an attempt to discourage his efforts in poking even more holes into the Swiss cheese of arguments against evolution. − Its almost as if the Question Evolution campaign is completely indefensible, so rather than make reasonable concessions, it is easier to just ignore and dismiss arguments. Unfortunately, that wont work this time. A block would be way to obvious, and would destroy any pretense of Conservapedia being anything other than an echo chamber. So instead, you make exceedingly pathetic attacks against Mr. Boucher's scientific prowess, in an attempt to preclude the inevitable thrashing he will deliver unto the Question Evolution! Campaign. Mr. Boucher isn't some evolutionist off of YouTube you can quote mine, and he's not a High School Freshman halfway through his first semester of biology. He is an actual scientist, by all '''objective''' measures, something that is not up for debate, and you are in quite the creationist pickle. So continue making all the pathetic, deceitful attacks you want, it doesn't make Mr. Boucher any less of a scientist, and dosn't make the Question Evolution! campain any less of a load of crap. [[User:LiesandDeciet|LiesandDeciet]] 09:14, 13 January 2012 (EST)
Talk:Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 14:22, January 13, 2012
, 14:22, January 13, 2012Reverted edits by LiesandDeciet (talk) to last revision by AugustO
:User:Conservative, when you stated ''AugustO, as far as the issue of dealing with a difficult people: our recent discussion, other events and material I read recently, has caused me to rethink matters and make some beneficial changes'', I hoped this would include stopping the stream of invectives you are hurling seemingly randomly on anyone who crosses your path. There is no need to call [[User:RudrickBoucher]] a ''pretentious fraud'' and ''shyster'', and those who defend him ''whiners''. You yourself are often inconsistent in your statements: sometimes you describe yourself as a single person (''I take a part in a nativity play'', ''I'm too sick to play my part'') sometimes you imply that you are a group of people. Following your example, I should disregard everything you write and answer to any of your statements with: '''''User:Conservative has proven to be a dyscalculexic fraud'''''. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:54, 11 January 2012 (EST)
:User:Conservative, when you stated ''AugustO, as far as the issue of dealing with a difficult people: our recent discussion, other events and material I read recently, has caused me to rethink matters and make some beneficial changes'', I hoped this would include stopping the stream of invectives you are hurling seemingly randomly on anyone who crosses your path. There is no need to call [[User:RudrickBoucher]] a ''pretentious fraud'' and ''shyster'', and those who defend him ''whiners''. You yourself are often inconsistent in your statements: sometimes you describe yourself as a single person (''I take a part in a nativity play'', ''I'm too sick to play my part'') sometimes you imply that you are a group of people. Following your example, I should disregard everything you write and answer to any of your statements with: '''''User:Conservative has proven to be a dyscalculexic fraud'''''. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 17:54, 11 January 2012 (EST)
|}
|}