Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
The '''Flying Spaghetti Monster'''("FSM") is a fictional creation used in the [[parody religion]] "Pastafarianism", also referred to as Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster("FSM").
+
The '''Flying Spaghetti Monster'''("FSM") is the God in "Pastafarianism", also referred to as Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster("FSM").
   −
The monstrous deity was created, noodly appendages and all, in 2005 to parody [[intelligent design]].<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/29/arts/design/29mons.html?ex=1282968000%26en=ee37c2cf9d5884e7%26ei=5090%26partner=rssuserland%26emc=rss But Is There Intelligent Spaghetti Out There? - New York Times]</ref>
+
The monstrous deity was created, noodly appendages and all, in 2005, to enlighten nonbelievers.  
 
  −
Although the Flying Spaghetti Monster is used by [[atheist]]s, such as [[Richard Dawkins]]{{fact}}, as a modern version of [[Russell's teapot]], the original point was a critique of the Kansas Board of Education's actions involving [[Intelligent Design]] and the notion of "teaching the controversy" by constructing a clearly ridiculous theological system and demostrating how it could be argued that such a construct could fit the notions put forth by proponents of [[Intelligent Design]] in the same manner as [[Christianity]].<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/27/AR2005082700019.html?nav=most_emailed Verbatim: Noodle This, Kansas - Washington Post]</ref>.
      
Pastafarianism took as its basis the decision by the Kansas Board of Education to redefine science in order to include [[Intelligent Design]].  The definitory change from science as "natural" explanation to science as "logical" explanation enabled Henderson to construct a theory which, if accepted as science, could be considered a better scientific theory than intelligent design.   
 
Pastafarianism took as its basis the decision by the Kansas Board of Education to redefine science in order to include [[Intelligent Design]].  The definitory change from science as "natural" explanation to science as "logical" explanation enabled Henderson to construct a theory which, if accepted as science, could be considered a better scientific theory than intelligent design.   
20

edits

Navigation menu