1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 159:
Line 159: + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 16:07, January 21, 2012
, 16:07, January 21, 2012no edit summary
:I do find the 90/10 rule a bit of a strange one. Considering how so many articles here are protected, in many cases for no apparent reason it seems, and how the [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette]] encourages a cautious approach to editing with an emphasis on discussing changes first, the best contributor could be someone who actually violates the 90/10 rule, because they are careful to ensure there is agreement about the change they want to make or simply that they can't edit the article due to protection. Then of course there are the debate pages which are clearly venues for people to talk about issues. The ratio of talk page to article edits alone is a very poor measure of the value of a contributor. It does seem one rule that can easily be abused. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 08:14, 14 January 2012 (EST)
:I do find the 90/10 rule a bit of a strange one. Considering how so many articles here are protected, in many cases for no apparent reason it seems, and how the [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette]] encourages a cautious approach to editing with an emphasis on discussing changes first, the best contributor could be someone who actually violates the 90/10 rule, because they are careful to ensure there is agreement about the change they want to make or simply that they can't edit the article due to protection. Then of course there are the debate pages which are clearly venues for people to talk about issues. The ratio of talk page to article edits alone is a very poor measure of the value of a contributor. It does seem one rule that can easily be abused. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 08:14, 14 January 2012 (EST)
::RudrickBoucher here, sorry for creating a new account--I couldn't figure out how to contact any of the admins. I have contributed a couple articles, although I was admittedly in violation of the 90/10 rules. User:Conservative has blocked me before for "liberal censorship" when I suggested removing the ridiculous "bestiality" section from the [[professor values]] page. Would a more mature administrator on this site be willing to unblock me? Thanks.