Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,695
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 132:
Line 132: +
Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton (view source)
Revision as of 21:09, January 22, 2012
, 21:09, January 22, 2012→"Open Marriage"
:::::Frankly, she is not worth the fuss. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:33, 20 January 2012 (EST)
:::::Frankly, she is not worth the fuss. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:33, 20 January 2012 (EST)
::::::Considering the front page is calling the Gingrich "open marriage" accusation "gossip," the level of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance required to sustain similar material on another page is staggering. [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 16:43, 20 January 2012 (EST)
::::::Considering the front page is calling the Gingrich "open marriage" accusation "gossip," the level of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance required to sustain similar material on another page is staggering. [[User:ScottDG|ScottDG]] 16:43, 20 January 2012 (EST)
:::::::Bullocks. These sources point out the coiners of the this neologism did not necessarily refer to extra-marital affairs. There is no doubt the Clinton's have practiced an open marriage both on the sexual plane ''and'' in the sense the original authors intended ([http://books.google.com/books/about/Open_marriage.html?id=dDNHAAAAMAAJ ''"the book is not necessarily about open sexual relationships, but more about trust and allowing one's life partner to be their own individual,"''] and [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/31/magazine/31o_neill.t.html ''"an open marriage might or might not include “sexual openness"'']). In the Gingrich case, "open marriage" clearly is intended to be slanderous, but that is not the issue here nor related to the Hillary Clinton bio. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:09, 22 January 2012 (EST)