Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,873
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 52:
Line 52: +
→How did CNN obtain sealed documents?: PS
::::: One of the involved parties has to request a court order that they be sealed. Really, Rob, it took me about a minute to come up with this information. That's the beauty of public records. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:43, 23 January 2012 (EST)
::::: One of the involved parties has to request a court order that they be sealed. Really, Rob, it took me about a minute to come up with this information. That's the beauty of public records. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:43, 23 January 2012 (EST)
::::::(a) the Georgia law can tell you the records exist, that is far different from being held for public viewing; (b) how do we know whether or not one party or the other requested they be sealed, being that (1) those posted on CNN's site are incomplete, and (2) the reluctance of ''both'' parties to discuss the case openly for 30 years? [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:58, 23 January 2012 (EST)
::::::(a) the Georgia law can tell you the records exist, that is far different from being held for public viewing; (b) how do we know whether or not one party or the other requested they be sealed, being that (1) those posted on CNN's site are incomplete, and (2) the reluctance of ''both'' parties to discuss the case openly for 30 years? [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:58, 23 January 2012 (EST)
::::::(c) and the site you posted clearly states the office "cannot issue a record", and only copies of the decree are available, not the actually filings and record. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:03, 23 January 2012 (EST)
==Stop the edit war!==
==Stop the edit war!==